A focused conformance checker for construction products: it maps your DPP data to sector-specific rules and produces a clear report of what’s missing or inconsistent — so you can fix issues before procurement review.
Construction Digital Product Passports are becoming part of the compliance surface. The operational risk isn’t “creating a DPP” — it’s submitting a dataset that fails a basic conformance review (missing fields, inconsistent structure, unclear mapping to sector rules).
Teams ship a “mostly complete” DPP and discover too late that procurement reviewers need a cleaner structure and a clearer mapping to construction-specific rule expectations.
Data is scattered or not consistently structured across products and variants.
Review turns into a back-and-forth loop with unclear “what to fix first”.
Tender timelines slip — and internal teams scramble.
Different reviewers check different things, in different order.
Conformance issues are caught late, and fixes are reactive.
More compliance overhead, less predictability.
A passport dataset that’s hard to validate is hard to trust.
Procurement reviewers request clarifications and re-submissions.
Risk of delays — or being excluded from a shortlist.
Most of today’s content explains what a Digital Product Passport is. What manufacturers still lack is a pre-flight conformance checker that turns “rules” into a repeatable validation flow.
Not a dashboard. Not a consulting slide deck. A focused checker that ingests your DPP dataset, applies construction-specific rule mapping, and outputs a practical fix list.
We’re onboarding a small cohort of construction product manufacturers who need a repeatable way to validate DPP datasets before tenders and procurement checks.